RED LISTS OF EUROPEAN BUTTERFLIES (LEPIDOPTERA: HESPERIOIDEA ET PAPILIONOIDEA): PROBLEMS OF CRITERIA AND INTEGRATION OF RUSSIAN ECOLOGICAL AND FAUNAL DATA
https://doi.org/ 10.18384/2310-7189-2018-1-95-118
Abstract
The methods and criteria used in the Red Book and European butterfly red lists are discussed and the status of European butterfly species is assessed. The status is identified due to the Species of European Conservation Concern, divided into four categories depending on their global conservation status, their European Threat Status and the proportion of their world range in Europe. The most important threats to European butterflies are ranged. Within the conservation strategy, habitat protection and management, climate change and development of the European butterfly indicators are considered. The Prime Butterfly Areas of Europe identified by European entomologists are discussed. The European Russia faunistic data is not entirely included in recent red butterfly lists and the solution of this problem is discussed.
About the Author
Dmitry V. Morgun
Moscow Centre of Ecology, Regional Research and Tourism
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Львовский А.Л., Моргун Д.В. Булавоусые чешуекрылые Восточной Европы. М.: Т-во научных изданий КМК, 2007. 443.
2. Плющ И.Г., Моргун Д.В., Довгайло К.Е., Солодовников И.А., Рубин Н.И. Дневные бабочки (Hesperioidea и Papilionoidea, Lepidoptera) Восточной Европы: CD определитель, база данных и пакет программ [Электронный ресурс]. Минск-Киев-Москва: Lysandra, 2005. 1 электрон. опт. диск (CD-ROM).
3. Als T.D., Vila R., Kandul N.P., Nash D.R., Yen S-H., Hsu Y-F., Mignault A.A., Boomsma J.J., Pierce N.E. The evolution of alternative parasitic life histories in Large Blue butterflies // Nature. 2004. no 432. Pp. 386-390.
4. Bergman K.O., Kindwall O. Population viability analysis of the butterfly Lopingaachine in a changing landscape in Sweden // Ecography. 2004. no 27. Pp. 49-58.
5. Dennis R.L.H., Williams W.R., Shreeve T.G. A multivariative approach to the determination of faunal structures among European butterfly species (Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera) // Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 1991. no 101. Pp. 1-49.
6. Dennis R.L.H., Shreeve T.G., Williams W.R. Affinity gradients among European butterflies: evidence for an historical component to species distributions // Entomologist’s Gazette. 1995. no 46. Pp. 141-153.
7. Dennis R.L.H., Shreeve T.G., Van Dyck H. Towards a resource-based concept for habitat: a butterfly biology viewpoint // Oikos. 2003. no 102. Pp. 417-426.
8. Elmes G.W., Free A. (eds.) Climate change and rare species in Britain (ITE Research publication). London: HMSO, 1994. 28 p.
9. Erhardt A. Ecology and conservation of alpine Lepidoptera // A.S. Pullin (ed.). Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies. London: Chapman and Hall. 1995. Pp. 258-276.
10. Gregory R.D., Van Strien A.J., Vorisek P., Gmelig Meyling A.W., Noble D.G., Foppen R. P. B., Gibbons D.W. Developing indicators for European birds // Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 2005. no 360. Pp. 269-288.
11. Grimmet R.F.A., Jones T.A. et al. Important Bird Areas in Europe. Cambridge: International Council for Bird Preservation,1989. 890 p.
12. Hanski I., Gilpin M.E. Metapopulation dynamics: brief history and conceptual domain // Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 1991. no 42. Pp. 3-16.
13. Hanski I., Ovaskainen O. The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape // Nature. 2000. no 404. Pp. 755-758.
14. Heath J. Threatened Rhopalocera (butterflies) in Europe // Nature and environment. Series 23. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe, 1981. 157 p.
15. IUCN. Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 3.1. // IUCN Species Survival Commission. [сайт]. - URL: http://www.iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/categories-and-criteria/2001-categories-criteria (дата обращения: 05.12.2017).
16. Kudrna O. The distribution atlas of European butterflies // Oedippus. 2002. no 20. pp. 1-342.
17. Maes D., Van Swaay C.A.M. A new methodology for compiling national Red Lists applied on butterflies (Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera) in Flanders (N. Belgium) and the Netherlands // Journal of Insect Conservation. 1997. no 1. Pp. 113-124.
18. Maes D., van Dyck H. Butterfly diversity loss in Flanders (north Belgium): Europe’s worst case scenario? // Biological Conservation. 2001. no 99. Pp. 263-276.
19. Maes D., Vanreusel W., Talloen W., Van Dyck H. Functional conservation units for the endangered Alcon Blue butterfly Maculineaalcon in Belgium (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) // Biological Conservation. 2004. no 120. Pp. 229-241.
20. Morgun D.V. Notes on the Paleophilotes (Inderskia) panope (Eversmann, 1851) (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae), a rare and little known lycaenid taxon for Europe // Zootaxa. 2013. Vol. 3619 (5): P. 595-600.
21. Pannekoek J., Van Strien A.J. TRIM 3 Manual: Trends and Indices for Monitoring Data. // CBS Statistics Netherlands [сайт]. - URL: http://www.ebcc.info/ (дата обращения 10.12.2017).
22. Parmesan C. Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change // Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics. 2006. no 37. Pp. 637-669.
23. Parmesan C., Ryrholm N., Stefanescu C. Poleward shifts in geographical ranges of butterfly species associated with regional warming // Nature. 1999. no 399. Pp. 579-583.
24. Poole A., Pienkowaki M., McCracken D.I., Petretti F., Brиdy C., Deffeyes C. (eds.). Mountain Livestock Farming and EU Policy Development (Proceedings of the 5 European Forum on Nature Conservation and Pasturalism). Cogne - Valle d’Aosta, 1998. 199 p.
25. Settele J., Kudrna O., Harpke A. et al. Climatic risk atlas of European butterflies // Biorisk. 2008. no 1. Pp. 1-710.
26. Thomas J.A., Abery J.C.G. Estimating rates of butterflies decline from distribution maps: the effect of scale // Biological Conservation.1995. no 73. Pp. 59-65.
27. Thomas J.A. The conservation of butterflies in temperate countries: past efforts and lessons for the future // Vane-Wright R.I., Ackery P.R. (eds.) Rhebiology of Butterflies. London, Academic Press, 1984. Pp. 333-353.
28. Thomas J.A. The conservation of declining butterfly populations in Britain and Europe: priorities, problems and successes // Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 1995. no 56. Pp. 55-72.
29. Thomas J.A. Holocene climate change and warm man-made refugia may explain why a sixth of British butterflies inhabit unnatural early successional habitats // Ecography. 1993. no 16. Pp. 278-284.
30. Thomas C.D. Ecology and conservation of butterfly metapopulations in the fragmented British landscape // Pullin A.S. (ed.). Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies. London: Chapman and Hall, 1995. Pp. 46-63.
31. Tucker G.M., Heath M.F. Birds in Europe: Their Conservation Status. Cambridge: Birdlife International, 1994. 600 p.
32. Van Swaay C.A.M., Warren M.S. Red Data Book of European Butterflies (Rhopalocera) // Nature and Environment. No 99. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe. 1999. 260 p.
33. Van Swaay C.A.M. Basisraport Rode Lijst Dagvlinders, Raport VS2006.002. Wageningen, Netherlands: De Vlinderstichting, 2006. 130 p.
34. Van Swaay C.A.M., Cuttelod A., Collins S. et al. European Red List of Butterflies. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. 2010. 48 p.
35. Van Swaay C.A.M., Maes D., Warren S. Martin Conservation status of European butterflies // Ecology of Butterflies in Europe. Cambridge: University Press. 2009. Pp. 332-338.
36. Van Swaay C.A.M., Warren M.S. (eds.). Prime Butterflies Areas in Europe: Priority Sites for Conservation. Netherlands, Wageningen, 2003. 6 p.
37. Van Swaay C.A.M. An assessment of the changes in butterfly abundance in the Netherlands during the twentieth century // Biological Conservation. 1990. no 52. Pp. 287-302.
38. Van Swaay C.A.M., Warren M., Loпs G. Biotope use and trends of European butterflies // Journal of Insect Conservation. 2006. no 10. Pp. 189-209.
39. Van Swaay C.A.M., van Strien A.J. Using butterfly monitoring data to develop a European grassland butterfly indicator // Kьhn E., Feldmann R., Thomas J.A., Settele J. (eds.) Studies on the Ecology and Conservation of Butterflies in Europe. Vol. 1. General Concepts and Case Studies. Moscow: Pensoft, 2005. Pp. 106-108.
40. Van Swaay C.A.M., Van Strien A.J. The European Butterfly Indicator for Grassland Species: 1990-2007, Report VJ2008.022. Netherlands, Wageningen: De Vlinderstichting, 2008. 22 p.
41. Warren M.S., Barnett L.K., Gibbons D.W., Avery M.I. Assessing national conservation priorities: an improved Red List of British Butterflies // Biological Conservation. 1997. no 82. Pp. 317-328.
42. Warren M.S., Key R.S. Woodlands: past, present and potential for insects // Collins N.M., Thomas J.A. (eds.). The Conservation of Insects and Their Habitats, London: Academic Press, 1991. Pp. 155-211.
43. Warren M.S., Hill J.K., Thomas J.A. et al. Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change // Nature. 2001. no 414. Pp. 65-69.
44. Warren M.S. The conservation of British butterflies // Dennis R.L.H. The Ecology of Butterflies of Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992. Pp. 246-274.
45. Wilson R.J., Gutierrez J., Martinez D., Agudo R., Monserrat V.J. Changes to the elevation limits and extent of species ranges associated with climate change // Ecology Letters. 2005. no 8. Pp. 1138-1146.
46. Wynhoff I., van Swaay C.A.M. Bedreigde en Kwetsbare Dagvlinders in Nederland: Basisraport met Voorstelvoor de Rode Lijst. Netherlands, Wageningen: De Vlinderstichting, 1995. 11 p.
Review
Views:
117
Email this article 