Preview

Geographical Environment and Living Systems

Advanced search

Transformation of the Altai Republic Socio-Ecological Systems in the Context of Climate Change

https://doi.org/10.18384/2712-7621-2025-3-6-31

Abstract

Aim. The purpose of the study is to identify patterns of territorial differentiation of the transformation processes of socio-ecological systems (SES) of the Altai Republic caused by climate change and the perceptions of the local population about them. Special attention is paid to comparing objective climate trends and subjective perceptions of local communities that influence their adaptive behavior.

Methodology. The study is based on a comprehensive approach that includes statistical analysis of long-term climate data and surveys of the local population regarding their views on climate change and adaptation to it. An analysis of linear trends in temperature and precipitation based on long-term data (1991–2023) from 11 weather stations in the Altai Republic was performed. The field stage is represented by an in-depth interview of 162 respondents in 33 localities, covering all physical and geographical provinces of the region. The identified narratives and adaptive practices were compared with objective climate monitoring data, which allowed us to establish areas of consistency and discrepancies between perception and reality.

Results. It has been established that climatic changes in Altai have a pronounced intraregional invariance: the most intense warming is recorded in the northern foothill regions, while in the highlands the changes are less pronounced. Seasonal and interannual variability increases the sense of «climate instability». The interview revealed significant differences in the level of concern of the population: from complete denial of climate change (Northeastern Altai) to high anxiety and profound transformations of economic activity (Southeastern Altai). The population is most concerned about climate change in areas where climatic conditions are initially extreme (very high annual and daily temperature ranges, pronounced aridity, and permafrost spread). Even a slight change in climate indicators is perceived by the population here as a catastrophic process. The main adaptive responses include changes in herd structure, shifting pasture cycles, abandoning traditional forms of environmental management, adjusting construction practices, and transforming agricultural systems. In some cases, adaptation is determined not by real trends, but by collective perceptions, which leads to erroneous socio-ecological strategies.

Research implications. The work contributes to the development of the theory of socio-ecological systems by demonstrating the complexity and non-linearity of climate–landscape–society relationships using the example of a mountainous region with a high natural and cultural mosaic. The practical significance lies in identifying the factors that determine the success or inefficiency of adaptation. The results can be used in the development of regional strategies for climate adaptation, environmental management planning, pasture resource management and improvement of institutional mechanisms for sustainable development of mountain areas.

About the Authors

D. A. Dirin
Tyumen State University
Russian Federation

Denis A. Dirin – PhD (Geography), Prof., Department of Physical Geography and Ecology, School of Natural Sciences

Tyumen



O. V. Marchukova
Tyumen State University; Institute of Natural and Technical Systems
Russian Federation

Olesya V. Marchukova – PhD (Geography), Assoc. Prof., Department of Physical Geography and Ecology, School of Natural Sciences; Senior Researcher, Laboratory of
Large-Scale Interaction of the Ocean, Atmosphere and Climate Change

Tyumen;

Sevastopol



D. A. Kozlova
South Federal University
Russian Federation

Diana A. Kozlova – PhD (History), Assoc. Prof., Department of Tourism, Institute of Tourism, Service and Creative Industries

Rostov-on-Don



M. A. Borisenko
Tyumen State University; Yugra State University
Russian Federation

Maxim A. Borisenko – PhD (Geography), Assoc. Prof., Higher School of Ecology; Researcher, Department of Physical Geography and Ecology, School of Natural Sciences

Tyumen;

Khanty-Mansiysk



M. V. Gudovskikh
Tyumen State University
Russian Federation

Maria V. Gudkovskikh – PhD (Geography), Assoc. Prof., Department of Physical Geography and Ecology, School of Natural Sciences



References

1. Lipka O. N., ed. Analiz i prognoz izmeneniy klimata v rossiyskoy chasti Altaye-Sayanskogo ekoregiona i na prigranichnykh territoriyakh Kazakhstana i Mongolii [Analysis and forecast of climate change in the Russian part of the Altai-Sayan ecoregion and in the border areas of Kazakhstan and Mongolia]. Moscow: Vsemirnyy fond dikoy prirody Publ., 2018. 289 p.

2. Ananicheva M. D., Litvinenko T. V., Filippova V. V. [Climate change in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) and its impact on the population: instrumental measurements and observations of local residents]. In: Geograficheskaya sreda i zhivyye sistemy [Geographical environment and living systems], 2021, no. 3, pp. 6–21. DOI: 10.18384/2712-7621-2021-3-6-21 (in Russ.).

3. Bardin M. Yu., Kozlova E. N., Platova T. V., Rankova E. Ya., et al. Vestnik arkheologii, antropologii i etnografii [Report on the peculiarities of the climate in the Russian Federation for 2024]. Moscow: Roshydromet Publ., 2025. 104 p.

4. Dirin D. A., Shiyan P. A., Gudkovsky M. V. [Modern ethnocultural differentiation of the territory of the Altai Republic]. In: Vestnik arkheologii, antropologii i etnografii [Bulletin of archeology, anthropology and ethnography], 2024, no. 3, pp. 173–187. DOI: 10.20874/2071-0437-2024-66-3-15

5. Filatkina Yu. E., ed. Doklad Rossiyskogo ekologicheskogo obshchestva «Adaptatsiya k izmeneniyu klimata: riski i vozmozhnosti» [Report of the Russian Ecological Society "Adaptation to climate change: risks and opportunities"]. Moscow: VASH FORMAT LLC Publ., 2025. 72 p.

6. Ermolaeva P. O., Kuznetsova I. B. [Public assessments of the socio-economic consequences of climate change based on materials from the Republic of Tatarstan]. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5: Geografiya [Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 5: Geography], 2018, no. 1, pp. 33–41.

7. Zhegusov Yu. I., Maksimov T. Kh. [Perception by the population of the impact of climate change on living conditions in a cold region (on the example of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)]. In: Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya [Sociological research], 2024, no. 9, pp. 145–151. DOI: 10.31857/S0132162524090139 (in Russ.).

8. Kokorin A. O. Izmeneniye klimata i yego vozdeystviye na ekosistemy, ekonomiku i ekonomiku rossiyskoy chasti Altaye-Sayanskogo ekoregiona: otsenochnyy doklad [Climate change and its impact on ecosystems, population and economy of the Russian part of the Altai-Sayan ecoregion: assessment report]. Moscow, 2011. 168 p.

9. Krasnoyarov B. A., Nazarenko A. E., Plutalova, T. G., Sharabarina S. N., Baryshnikov S. G. [Vulnerability assessment of agrarianoriented natural and economic systems]. In: Izvestiya Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Nauki o Zemle [Izvestia of Irkutsk State University. Series: Earth Sciences], 2024, no. 49, pp. 72–87. DOI: 10.26516/2073-3402.2024.49.72 (in Russ.).

10. Mandych A. F., Yashina T. V., Artemov I. A., Dekenov V. V. et al. Sokhraneniye bioraznoobraziya v rossiyskoy chasti Altaye-Sayanskogo ekoregiona v usloviyakh izmeneniya klimata. Strategiya adaptatsii [Biodiversity conservation in the Russian part of the Altai-Sayan ecoregion under climate change. Adaptation strategy]. Krasnoyarsk, 2012. 62 p.

11. Marchukova O. V., Dirin D. A., Borisenko M. A., Gudkovsky M. V. [Trends in climate change in Gorny Altai in the post-Soviet period]. In: InterKarto. InterGIS [InterKarto. InterGIS], 2024, vol. 30, iss. 1, pp. 224–231. DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2024-1-30-224-231

12. Medvedkov, A. A. [Transformation of "feeding landscapes" and traditional culture of indigenous Siberian populations under climate change]. In: InterKarto. InterGIS [InterKarto. InterGIS], 2016, no. 22, pp. 62–70. DOI: 10.24057/2414-9179-2016-1-22-62-70

13. Mkrtchyan G. M., Blam I. Yu., Kovalev S. Yu., Tsvelodub Yu. O. The influence of climate on subjective assessments of household well-being in Russia. In: Region: Ekonomika i Sotsiologiya [Region: Economics and Sociology], 2017, no. 3, pp. 254–276. DOI: 10.15372/REG20170313

14. Samoilova G. S. [Landscape structure of the physical and geographical regions of the Altai-Sayan country]. In: Zemlevedeniye. Sbornik Moskovskogo obshchestva ispytateley prirody. T. XVII [Land science. Collection of the Moscow Society of Naturalists. Vol. XVII]. Moscow: Moscow University Publ., 1990, pp. 53–66.

15. Svinoboev A. N., Neustroeva A. B. (2017). Climate change and living conditions in the North in the perception of the indigenous population. In: Urbanistika [Urbanistics], 2017, no. 4, pp. 28–39. DOI: 10.7256/2310-8673.2017.4.24619 (in Russ.).

16. Kharlamova N. F. Otsenka i prognoz sovremennykh izmeneniy klimata Altayskogo regiona [Assessment and forecast of modern climate changes in the Altai region]. Barnaul: Altai University Publ., 2013. 156 p.

17. Ahamed R. A., Mal S., Maharana P. Community perceptions of climate change in Manipur, India. In: Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2025, vol. 156, pp. 92. DOI: 10.1007/s00704-024-05319-5

18. Alhassan I., Teklehaimanot A., Solomon N., Gufi Y., et al. Perception and trends of climate change: assessing impacts on smallholder farmers and Agro-Pastoral communities in Northern Ethiopia. In: Discover Agriculture, 2025, vol. 3, pp. 106. DOI: 10.1007/s44279-025-00272-x

19. Boori M. S., Voženílek V. Remote Sensing and GIS for Socio-Hydrological Vulnerability. In: Journal of Geology & Geosciences, 2014, vol. 3, iss. 3. DOI: 10.4172/2329-6755.1000e115

20. Brookfield H. C. American Geography and one non-American geographer. In: GeoJournal, 2004, vol. 59, pp. 39–41.

21. Brookfield H. C. On the environment as perceived. In: Board C., et al, eds. Progress in Geography. London, 1969. P. 39–41.

22. Cuni-Sanchez A., Omeny P., Pfeifer M., Olaka L., Mamo M. B., et al. Climate change and pastoralists: perceptions and adaptation in montane Kenya. In: Climate and Development, 2019, vol. 11, pp. 513–524. DOI: 10.1080/17565529.2018.1454880

23. Watson R. T., Zakri A. H., eds. Ecosystems and Human Well-being. Washington: Island Press, 2005. 268 c.

24. Eniolorunda N. B. Climate Change Analysis and Adaptation: The Role of Remote Sensing (Rs) and Geographical Information System (Gis). In: International Journal of Computational Engineering Research, 2014, vol. 4, iss. 1, pp. 41–51.

25. Hasanuzzaman M., Bera B., Islam A., Shit P. K. Exploring GIS-based modeling for assessing social vulnerability to Ganga Riverbank erosion, India. In: Natural Hazards Research, 2025, vol. 5, iss. 1, pp. 134–147. DOI: 10.1016/j.nhres.2024.08.001

26. Ikhumhen H. O., Fang Q., Lu Sh., Meilana L., Lopes N. D. Investigating socioecological vulnerability to climate change via remote sensing and a data-driven ranking algorithm. In: Journal of Environmental Management, 2023, vol. 347. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119254

27. Islam T., Haque M. ZU., Nath T. K., Karmakar Sh., et al. Perceptions of local communities on climate change and associated impact on livelihood capital in the coastal area of southeastern Bangladesh. In: Discover Environment, 2025, vol. 3, pp. 89. DOI: 10.1007/s44274-025-00302-x

28. Iyeme E. E., Ekah U. J., Njok A. O., Agbo E. P., Offorson G. C. Trend Analysis of Climate Change across Nigeria: A Mann-Kendall and Sen’s Approach. In: Archives of Current Research International, 2024, iss. 24, pp. 450–467. DOI: 10.9734/acri/2024/v24i11985

29. Izquierdo A., Schlingmann A. Local perceptions of climate change in the context of socioeconomic and political changes in a High Andean community from the Argentine Puna. In: Routledge Handbook of Climate Change Impacts on Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities, 2023, pp. 136–150. DOI: 10.4324/9781003356837-11

30. Kehler S., Birchall J. S. Social vulnerability and climate change adaptation: The criticalimportance of moving beyond technocratic policy approaches. In: Environmental Science & Policy, 2021, vol. 124, pp. 471–477. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.07.025

31. Kemarau R. A., Suab S. A., Eboy O. V., Sa’adi Z., et al. Integrative Approaches in Remote Sensing and GIS for Assessing Climate Change Impacts Across Malaysian Ecosystems and Societies. In: Sustainability, 2025, iss. 17, p. 1344. DOI: 10.3390/su17041344

32. Kumar A., Devi J. P., Bhaskar D. et al. Perceptions and impacts of climate change in Central India: A study of tribal communities. In: Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2025, vol. 156. DOI: 10.1007/s00704-025-05653-2

33. Méndez-Vallejo C., Simpson N. P., Johnson F. X., Birt A. Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report (Full Volume) Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Switzerland, 2023. 184 pp. DOI: 10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647

34. Morris B. S., Chrysochou P., Christensen J. D., Orquin J. L., et al. Stories vs. facts: triggering emotion and action-taking on climate change. In: Climatic Change, 2019, iss. 154, pp. 19–36.

35. Ngute A. S. K., Marchant R., Cuni-Sanchez A. Climate Change, Perceptions, and Adaptation Responses Among Farmers and Pastoralists in the Cameroon Highlands. In: Luetz J. M., Ayal D., eds. Handbook of Climate Change Management. Springer, Cham, 2021, pp. 1–14. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-57281-5_311

36. Ostrom E. A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems. In: Science, 2009, vol. 325, iss. 5939, pp. 419–422. DOI: 10.1126/science.1172133

37. Selje T., Schmid L. A., Heinz B. Community-Based Adaptation to Climate Change: Core Issues and Implications for Practical Implementations. In: Climate, 2024, no. 12, pp. 155. DOI: 10.3390/cli12100155

38. Thomas K., Hardy R. D., Lazrus H., Mendez M., et al. Explaining differential vulnerability to climate change: A social science review. In: Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change, 2019, vol. 10, p. e565. DOI: 10.1002/wcc.565

39. Tabassum S., Alam S. The Effect of Climate Change in Rajshahi, Bangladesh: An Analysis of Seasonal Trends and Their Implications. In: International Journal of Environmental Management and Renewable Energy System, 2025, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 80–97.

40. Vedwan N., Rhoades R. E. Climate change in the Western Himalayas of India: a study of local perception and response. In: Climate Research, 2001, vol. 19, pp. 109–117. DOI: 10.3354/cr019109

41. Volkov I. V., Zemtsov V. A., Erofeev A. A., Babenko A. S., Volkova A. I., et al. The dynamic land-cover of the Altai Mountains: Perspectives based on past and current environmental and biodiversity changes. In: Ambio, 2021, vol. 50, pp. 1991–2008. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-021-01605-y

42. Wannewitz M., Garschagen M. Collective adaptation to climate change. In: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2023, vol. 61, p. 101248. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101248

43. Yu Cai, Aftab Khan, Minjuan Zhao. Understanding herders’ risk perceptions and preferences for climate change adaptations: an empirical study of pre and post disaster. In: International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 2025, vol. 23. DOI: 10.1080/14735903.2025.2493400

44. Zohner C. M., Mirzagholi L., Renner S. S., Mo L., et al. Effect of climate warming on the timing of autumn leaf senescence reverses after the summer solstice. In: Science, 2023, vol. 381, iss. 6653. DOI: 10.1126/science.adf5098


Review

Views: 826

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2712-7613 (Print)
ISSN 2712-7621 (Online)