Assessment of the Urban Environment Quality in Large Cities of Kazakhstan: Socio-Ecological Aspects

Aim. Development of the urban environment quality index and its calculation for cities of Kazakhstan with a population of more than 250 thousand people.

Methodology. Study of the conceptual framework on urban environment and its quality, search and analysis of scientific articles and books, as well as existing methods for calculating urban environment quality and quality of life indices. Development of an index, collection and design of a database for major cities in Kazakhstan. A database was compiled based on 18 indicators divided into 4 blocks: environmental friendliness, safety, comfort and accessibility, housing conditions and improvement. Based on the data obtained, a general rating of urban environment quality was compiled, the results were verified, and suggestions were made to improve the quality of urban environment.

Results. The urban environment quality index has been developed and calculated for 14 major cities in Kazakhstan. Based on the results obtained, a ranking of cities was compiled based on the quality of the urban environment, with recommendations for improving its quality.

Research implications. The paper considers concepts and terms, examines existing methods and indexes related to the quality of the urban environment. A content analysis of publications on the quality of the urban environment has been carried out. A system of indicators and a methodology for assessing the quality of the urban environment have been developed. The calculation of the indicators is based on the processing and interpretation of the data obtained on the quality of the urban environment. Based on the results of the assessment, the main problems in cities affecting the quality of the urban environment have been identified and proposals have been developed to minimize them with recommendations for the application of successful practices.

1. Agafonova A. V., Generalov V. P. [On the Problems of Creating a High-Quality Living Environment in Large Cities of Russia]. In: Traditsii i innovatsii v stroitelstve i arkhitekture. Arkhitektura i gradostroitelstvo [Traditions and Innovations in Construction and Architecture. Architecture and Urban Development]. Samara: SSTU, 2021, pp. 457–465.

2. Akhiezer A. S., Shomina E. S., Yanitsky O. N. Ekologicheskiye problemy kapitalisticheskogo goroda [Environmental Problems of a Capitalist City]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1985. 184 p.

3. Bityukova V. R. Sotsialno-ekologicheskiye problemy razvitiya gorodov Rossii [Social and Environmental Problems of Urban Development in Russia]. Moscow: LENAND Publ., 2019. 456 p.

4. Ilyina I. N. Quality of the Urban Environment as a Factor in Sustainable Development of Municipalities. In: Imushchestvennyye otnosheniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Property Relations in the Russian Federation], 2015, no. 5, pp. 69–82.

5. Krasheninnikov A. V. Kognitivnyye modeli gorodskoy sredy [Cognitive Models of the Urban Environment]. Moscow: KURS, 2021. 209 p.

6. Medvedkov A. A., Nikanorova A. D., Shabalina N. V. Functional zoning of Kirovsk town (the Murmansk region) in conditions of tourist and recreational development of its territory. In: InterKarto. InterGIS [InterCarto. InterGIS], 2019, vol. 25 (part 2), pp. 429–436 DOI: 10.35595/2414-9179-2019-2-25-429-436

7. Osipov G. V. Izmereniye sotsialnoy realnosti. Pokazateli i indikatory [Measuring Social Reality. Indicators and Indicators]. Moscow: ISPI RAS Publ., 2011. 172 p.

8. Polyakova E. Yu., Lyakhova N. I., Novikova O. A. [Methodology for assessing the quality and comfort of the urban environment]. In: Vestnik Altayskoy akademii ekonomiki i prava [Bulletin of the Altai Academy of Economics and Law], 2021, no. 11 (Part 2), pp. 303–308.

9. Popov E. A. [Urban environment as an object of study in sociology]. In: Sotsiodinamika [Sociodynamics], 2019, no. 9, pp. 20–24.

10. Popov A. A. Otsenka differentsiatsii kachestva gorodskoy sredy g. Moskvy: dis. ... kand. geogr. nauk [Assessment of territorial differentiation of the quality of the urban environment of Moscow: dissertation]. Moscow: 2008. 233 p.

11. Sarchenko V. I., Khirevich S. A. [Determining the economic essence of the formation of a high-quality urban environment]. In: Problemy sovremennoy ekonomiki [Problems of the modern economy], 2016, no. 2, pp. 182–186.

12. Tokareva V. N. [Ecology of the urban environment and factors of its formation]. In: StudNet, 2022, no. 6, pp. 1–8.

13. Antrop M. Background concepts for integrated landscape analysis. In: Agriculture. Ecosystems and Environment, 2000, no. 77, pp. 17–28. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00089-4

14. Ayres R. U., Kneese A. V. Pollution and environmental quality. In: The Quality of the Urban Environment. Routledge, 2015, pp. 33–71.

15. Blumenfeld H. Criteria for judging the quality of the urban environment. Canada, 1974. 14 p.

16. Bonaiuto M., Fornara F., Bonnes M. Perceived Residential Environment Quality in Middle- and Low-Extension Italian Cities. In: European Review of Applied Psychology, 2006, no. 56, pp. 23–34. DOI: 10.1016/j.erap.2005.02.011

17. Cutter S. L. Rating Places: A Geographer’s View on Quality of Life. Washington, 1985. 76 p.

18. Hagerty M. R. Testing Maslow’s hierarchy of needs: national quality-of-life across time. In: Social Indicators Research, 1999, no. 46, pp. 249–271.

19. Hudson P., Pocock D. Focal Problems in Geography: Images of the Urban Environment. London: Macmillan Press Ltd., 1978. 181 p.

20. Jian G. E., Kazunori H. Residential Environment Index System and Evaluation Model Established by Subjective and Objective Methods. In: Journal of Zhejiang University Science, 2004, no. 5, pp. 1028–1034. DOI: 10.1631/jzus.2004.1028

21. Khan M., Aftab S., Fakhruddin B. Quality of Urban Environment: A Critical Review of Approaches and Methodologies. In: Current Urban Studies, 2015, no. 3, pp. 368–384. DOI: 10.4236/cus.2015.34029

22. Mao Y. H., Fornara F., Manca S., Bonnes M., Bonaiuto M. Perceived Residential Environment Quality Indicators and Neighborhood Attachment: A Confirmation Study on a Chinese Sample in Chongqing. In: PsyCh Journal, 2015, no. 4, pp. 123–137.

23. Marans R. Quality of Urban Life Studies: An Overview and Implications for EnvironmentBehaviour Research. In: Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012, no. 35, pp. 9–22. DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.02.058.

24. McCrea R., Shyy T.-K., Stimson R. What is the Strength of the Link between Objective and Subjective Indicators of Urban Quality of Life? In: Applied Research in Quality of Life, 2006, no. 1, pp. 79–96. DOI: 10.1007/ s11482-006-9002-2

25. Newman P.W.G. Sustainability and cities: extending the metabolism model. In: Landscape Urban Plann, 1999, no. 33, pp. 219–226.