Scientific and methodological aspects of teaching courses on geoecological problems of plains and mountains areas in the permafrost zone
https://doi.org/10.18384/2712-7621-2024-3-123-148
Abstract
Aim. To reveal scientific and methodological techniques for creating and teaching geoecological disciplines in bachelor's and master's programs based on long-term methodological developments of Cryolithology and Glaciology Department of the Faculty of Geography of Lomonosov Moscow State University.
Methodology. The author's methodology for studying, assessing and mapping the permafrostecological state of flat and mountainous permafrost areas is presented, based on landscape methods: landscape-indicative and landscape-structural. The advantages and disadvantages of the method of point expert assessments and one of the techniques for their improvement are shown. The conceptual provisions of the stability of cryogenic and high-mountain geosystems to mechanical disturbances of the surface are presented. The main assessment factors of avalanche danger and risk for recreational facilities in the mountains are listed.
Results. The concepts of "geoecology of the cryolithozone", "stability of northern geosystems", "crisis geoecological situation" necessary for the geosystem approach to geoecological problems are formulated. The factors of cryogenic processes activation at different mapping scales and hazard & risk factors for high mountain areas are analyzed. A graphic-analytical method for comparing factor scores against the background of an interval scale in “quality centers” is shown. Examples of original practical tasks are demonstrated. The procedure for the integrated assessment of the lithocryogenic stability factors of landscapes to the manifestation of undesirable cryogenic processes is disclosed along with the factors of their bioresource value in order to obtain quantitative indices for ranking landscapes according to the degree of vulnerability to development. A number of significant permafrost maps compiled on a landscape basis are listed. Examples of original practical tasks are demonstrated.
Research implications. The multifactor integral assessment methodology is in demand in engineering-geographical research, particularly during pre-project stages of land development, ensuring the reliable operation of engineering structures in the cryolithozone while maximizing environmental preservation. The methodological techniques are of practical interest for training specialists in natural sciences on environmental studies of the cryolithozone and mountainous regions.
Keywords
About the Authors
L. I. ZotovaRussian Federation
Larisa I. Zotova – PhD (Geography), Senior Researcher, Department of Сryolithology and Glaciology, Faculty of Geography
Leninskye Gory 1, Moscow 119991
M. A. Vikulina
Russian Federation
Marina A. Vikulina – PhD (Geography), Senior Researcher, Department of Сryolithology and Glaciology, Faculty of Geography
Leninskye Gory 1, Moscow 119991
References
1. Alekseev V. R. Geometriya kriolitozonov [Geometry of the cryolithozone], Yakutsk, 2015. 120 p.
2. Viktorov S. V., Chikishev A. G. Landshaftnaya indikatsiya i yeye prakticheskoye primeneniye [Landscape indication and its practical application]. Moscow, izd-vo Mosk. un-ta Publ., 1990. 200 p.
3. Vikulina M. A. [Avalanche risk assessment in Khibiny]. in: interKarto. interGiS [interCarto. interGiS], 2019, vol. 25, pp. 66–76.
4. Vikulina M. A. [Avalanche danger and risk in Khibiny in the context of recreation development at the beginning of the 21st century]. in: Gidrosfera. Opasnyye protsessy i yavleniya [Hydrosphere. Dangerous processes and phenomena], 2023, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 276–287. Doi: 10.34753/HS.2022.4.3.276
5. Vysotskaya A. A., Medvedkov A. A. [Climate-driven “greening” of the kurum landscape in the valley of the lower reaches of the Podkamennaya Tunguska river]. in: InterCarto. InterGIS [interCarto. interGiS], 2022, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 305–313. Doi: 10.35595/24149179-2022-1-28-305-313
6. Garagulya L. S., Gordeeva G. i., Khilimonyuk V. Z. [Methodological foundations of ecological geocryology]. in: Ershov E. D., ed. Osnovy geokriologii. CH. 6: Geokriologicheskiy prognoz i ekologicheskiye problemy v kriolitozone [Fundamentals of geocryology. Part 6: Geocryological forecast and ecological problems in the cryolithozone]. Moscow, Moscow University Press, 2008, pp. 471–488.
7. Solomatin V. i., ed. Geoekologiya Severa [Geoecology of the North]. Moscow, izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 1992. 270 p.
8. Golubev G. N. Geoekologiya [Geoecology]. Moscow, izd-vo GEoS Publ., 1999. 338 p.
9. Gorshkov S. P. Kontseptualnyye osnovy geoekologii [Conceptual foundations of geoecology]. Moscow, Zheldorizdat Publ., 2001. 568 p.
10. Grebenets V. i., Yurov F. D., Kizyakov A. i., Zotova L. i., Maslakov A. A., Tolmanov V. A., Streletskaya i. D. [Assessment of the impact of hazardous cryogenic processes on engineering facilities in the Arctic]. in: Vestnik Rossiyskogo fundamental'nykh issledovaniy [Bulletin of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research], 2022, no. 3–4, pp. 87–102. Doi: 10.22204/24104639-2022-115-116-03-04-87-102
11. Drozdov D. S., Malkova G. V., Romanovsky V. E., Vasiliev A. A., Brushkov A. V., et al. [Digital maps of the cryolithozone and assessment of modern changes in the cryolithozone]. in: Zhang R. V., ed. Materialy XI mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma po problemam inzhenernogo merzlotovedeniya [Proceedings of the 11th international Symposium on Problems of Permafrost Engineering]. Yakutsk, 2017, pp. 233–234.
12. Zotova L. i. [Theoretical and applied aspects of expert geoecological assessment of the danger of economic development within the framework of the new educational program]. in: Ekologicheskiye problemy kriolitozony [Ecological problems of the cryolithozone], 2011, vol. 3, pp. 224–231.
13. Zotova L. i. [integral assessment of the lithocryogenic and bioresource state of the landscapes of the Taz Peninsula]. in: Problemy regionalnoy ekologii [Problems of regional ecology], 2015, no. 4, pp. 121–130.
14. isachenko A. G. Vvedeniye v ekologicheskuyu geografiyu [introduction to environmental geography]. St. Petersburg, izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta Publ., 2003. 192 p.
15. Kudryavtsev V. A. [Permafrost survey as the main type of permafrost research]. in: Merzlotnyye issledovaniya [Permafrost research], 1961, iss. i, pp. 3–10.
16. Melnikova E. S., Veismana L. i., Kritsuk L. N., eds. Landshaftnyye indikatory inzhenernogeokriologicheskikh usloviy severa Sibiri i ikh deshifrovochnyye priznaki [Landscape indicators of engineering-geocryological conditions of the north of Western Siberia and their deciphering features]. Moscow, Nedra Publ., 1974. 122 p.
17. Medvedkov A. A. [indication of the state of permafrost-taiga landscapes on the southern periphery of the cryolithozone in a changing climate]. in: Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Yestestvennyye nauki [Bulletin of Moscow State Regional University. Series: Natural Sciences], 2018, no. 1, pp. 18–28. Doi: 10.18384/23107189-2018-1-18-28
18. Moskalenko N. G. Antropogennaya dinamika rastitelnosti svyazana s kriolitozonami Rossii [Anthropogenic dynamics of vegetation on the plains of the cryolithozone of Russia]. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 1999. 280 p.
19. Moskovchenko D. V. [Assessment of modern dynamics of landscapes of the Zapolyarnoye field using satellite data]. in: Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekologiya i prirodopolzovaniye [Bulletin of Tyumen State University. Ecology and Nature Management], 2018, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 6–16.
20. Mudrov Yu. V. Merzlotnyye yavleniya v kriolitozone i gor [Permafrost Phenomena in the Cryolithozone of Plains and Mountains]. Moscow, Nauchnyy mir Publ., 2007. 316 p.
21. osadchaya G. G. [Local landscapes as indicators of geocryological zonality (using the European North-East as an example)]. in: Kriosfera Zemli [Cryosphere of the Earth], 2012, vol. XVi, no. 3, pp. 62–71.
22. osipov V. i. [Geoecology: concept, tasks, priorities]. in: Geoekologiya [Geoecology], 1997, no. 1, pp. 3–11.
23. Garaguli L. S., Ershov E. D., eds. Prirodnyye opasnosti Rossii. Geokriologicheskaya opasnost [Natural hazards of Russia. Geocryological hazards]. Moscow, izd. firma «Kruk» Publ., 2000. 316 p.
24. ilyina i. S., Lapshina E. i., Lavrenko N. i., et al. Rastitelnyy pokrov Zapadno-Sibirskoy granitsy [Vegetation cover of the West Siberian Plain].Novosibirsk, Nauka. Sibirskoye otd-niye Publ., 1985. 251 p.
25. Simonov Yu. G. [Score assessments in applied geographical research and ways to improve them]. in: Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5: Geografiya [Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 5: Geography], 1997, no. 4, pp. 7–10.
26. Solntsev V. N. Istoriya universitetskoy kafedry fizicheskoy geografii mira i geoekologii [History of the University Department of Physical Geography of the World and Geoecology]. Moscow, izd-vo GEoS Publ., 2008. 120 p.
27. Timashev i. E. [Geoecology: primary sources, approaches, prospects]. in: Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5: Geografiya [Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 5: Geography], 2000, no. 5, pp. 18–22.
28. Trofimov V. T. Teoreticheskiye aspekty geoekologii [Theoretical aspects of geoecology]. Moscow, KDU Publ., 2020. 148 p.
29. Tumel N. V. [Activation of dangerous cryogenic processes]. in: Geografiya, obshchestvo, okruzhayushchaya sreda. T. 1. Struktura, dinamika i evolyutsiya sistem [Geography, society, environment. Vol. 1. Structure, dynamics and evolution of natural systems]. Moscow, izd. dom «Gorodets» Publ., 2004, pp. 344–357.
30. Tumel V. F. [on permafrost survey]. in: Izvestiya AN SSSR. Seriya geofizicheskaya [Bulletin of the USSR Academy of Sciences. Geophysical Series], 1945, vol. iX, no. 2, pp. 135–144.
31. Tumel N. V., Zotova L. i. Geoekologiya kriolitozony [Geoecology of the cryolithozone]. Moscow, Yurait Publ., 2023. 204 p.
32. Tumel N. V., Zotova L. i. [Ambiguity of landscape indication of permafrost conditions at different scales of mapping the cryolithozone of Russia]. in: Zhuravleva N. A., Viskhadzhieva K. S., eds. Inzhenernyye izyskaniya v stroitelstve [Engineering surveys in construction]. Moscow, 2018, pp. 234–240.
33. Tumel N. V., Koroleva N. A. [Permafrost-landscape differentiation of the cryolithozone of Russia as a basis for ecological and geological research]. in: Inzhenernaya geologiya [Engineering Geology], 2008, no. 2, pp. 11–14.
34. Tyrtikov A. P. O vliyanii rastitel'nosti na mnogoletnyuyu podpochvu. Materialy k osnovam ucheniy o merzlykh zonakh zemnoy kory [on the influence of vegetation on perennial subsoil. Materials for the fundamentals of the doctrine of frozen zones of the earth's crust]. Moscow, izd-vo AN SSSR Publ., 1956, pp. 85–108.
35. Chigir V. G., Lanchakov G. A., Kulkov A. N. [Geoecological conditions of the north of the West Siberian Plain and problems of cryogeosystem stability to technogenesis]. in: Problemy obshchey i prikladnoy geoekologii Severa [Problems of general and applied geoecology of the North]. Moscow, izd-vo Mosk. un-ta Publ., 2001, pp. 222–236.
36. Shestakova A. A. Kartografirovaniye merzlotnykh landshaftov s uchetom suktsessiy rastitelnosti (po printsipu Prilenskogo plato): avtoref. … dis. kand. geograf. nauk [Mapping of permafrost landscapes taking into account vegetation successions (using the Prilensky Plateau as an example): Cand. Sci thesis in Geografic Sciences]. Yakutsk, 2011. 20 p.
37. Shpolyanskaya N. A., Zotova L. i. [Map of landscape stability in the cryolithozone of Western Siberia]. in: Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 5: Geografiya [Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 5: Geography], 1994, no. 1, pp. 56–66.
38. Zou D., Zhao L., Sheng Y., Chen J., Wu T., Wu J., Xie C., et al. A new map of permafrost distribution on the Tibetan Plateau. in: Cryosphere, 2017, vol. 11, iss. 6, pp. 2527–2542. Doi: 10.5194/tc-11-2527-2017
39. Kislov A., Alyautdinov A., Baranskaya A., Belova N., Bogatova D., Vikulina M., Zheleznova i. et al. A Spatially Detailed Projection of Environmental Conditions in the Arctic initiated by Climate Change. in: Atmosphere, 2023, vol. 14. Doi: 10.3390/atmos14061003
40. Fuchs S., Shnyparkov A., Jomelli V., Kazakov N., Sokratov S. Editorial to the special issue on natural hazards and risk research in Russia. in: Natural Hazards, 2017, vol. 88, pp. 1–16. Doi: 10.1007/s11069-017-2976-2
41. Fedorov A. N. Permafrost Landscapes: Classification and Mapping. in: Geosciences, 2019, no. 9. Doi: 10.3390/geosciences9110468
42. Kizyakov A., Leibman M. Cryogenic Relief Formation Processes: a Review of 2010–2015 Publications. in: Earth`s Cryosphere, 2016, vol. XX, pp. 40–52. Doi: 10.21782/KZ15607496-2016-4(45-58)
43. Medvedkov A., Vysotskaya A., olchev A. Detection of Geocryological Conditions in Boreal Landscapes of the Southern Cryolithozone Using Thermal infrared Remote Sensing Data: A Case Study of the Northern Part of the Yenisei Ridge. in: Remote Sensing, 2023, vol. 15, no. 2: 291. Doi: 10.3390/rs15020291
44. Fedorov A., Vasilyev N., Torgovkin Y., Shestakova A., Varlamov S., Zheleznyak M. Permafrost-landscape map of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) at scale 1:1 500 000. in: Geosciences, 2018, no. 8. Doi: 10.3390/geosciences8120465
45. Komarov A. Y., Seliverstov Y. G., Glazovskaya T. G., Turchaninova A. S. Risk assessment in the North Caucasus ski resorts. in: Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 2016, vol. 16, pp. 2227–2234. Doi: 10.5194/nhess-16-2227-2016
46. Wu X., Nan Z., Cheng G., Zhao S. Spatial modeling of permafrost distribution and properties on the Qinghai-Tibet Platea. in: Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, 2018, vol. 29. Doi: 10.1002/ppp.1971
47. Shnyparkov A. L., Fuchs S., Sokratov S. A., Koltermann K. P., Seliverstov Yu. G., Vikulina M. A. Theory and practice of individual snow avalanche risk assessment in the Russian Arctic. in: Geography, Environment, Sustainability, 2012, vol. 5, pp. 64–81. Doi: 10.24057/2071-9388-2012-5-3-64-81
48. Tumel N., Zotova L. Diagnostics and Mapping of Geoecological Situations in the Permafrost Zone of Russia. in: Geosciences, 2019, no. 9, pp. 1–31. Doi: 10.3390/geosciences9080353
49. Maslakov A., Zotova L., Komova N., Grishchenko M., Zamolodchikov D., Zelensky G. Vulnerability of the Permafrost Landscapes in the Eastern Chukotka Coastal Plains to Human impact and Climate Change. in: Land, 2021, vol. 10, pp. 1–15. Doi: 10.24057/2071-93882021-039
50. Zotova L. i. Landscape indication of Permafrost Conditions for Geoecological Assessment & Mapping at Various Scales. in: Geography, Environment, Sustainability, 2021, vol. 14, pp. 33–40. Doi: 10.24057/2071-9388-2021-039