Land use of post-mining sites: Japan’s experience and lessons for Russia

Aim. The purpose of this study is to identify local features and differences in the usage of mining heritage in Japan and their determining factors.

Methodology. Use is made of the implication of comparative geographical and expeditionary research methods to identify and compare the usage of former mining sites in Kamaishi and Asio. Results. Uses of former resource extraction sites such as establishment of mine museums, tourism development, and organization of ecological and educational activities are revealed in Kamaishi (Iwate Prefecture) and Ashio (Tochigi Prefecture). The location of the object and its history as well as the interests of the company and local communities determine the specifics of options in using and preserving the mining heritage. The conclusion is made about possibilities of the Japanese experience application in densely populated territories of Russia with good transport accessibility. But there are usage limitations of such an experience in poorly developed and remote areas in the north and east of the country.

Research implications. The research results deepen the understanding of the diversity of mining heritage usage in all over the world and clarify the factors affecting local specifics. The practical significance lies in the application of Japan’s experience for organization of tourist and museum activities in the areas of former mining sites in Russia and other countries.

1. Volgin A. V., Evdokimov M. Yu., Krylov P. M. [Transport and tariff accessibility of recreational facilities in the Moscow region]. In: [Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University. Series: Natural Sciences], 2019, no. 3, pp. 27–40. DOI 10.18384/2310-7189-2019-3-27-40

2. Grinko N. K., Grun V. D., Lunev V. G. [World heritage of mining]. In: Gornaya promyshlennost [Mining industry], 2012, no. 2, pp. 136–142.

3. Zapariy V.V. [“Industrial heritage” and its modern interpretation]. In: Akademicheskii vestnik UralNIIproekt RAASN [Academic Bulletin UralNIIproekt RAASN], 2009, no. 1, pp. 34–37.

4. Kovalev M. V., Isachenko A. P., retz. Industrialnoe nasledie Rossii: mezhdistsiplinarnye issledovaniya, opyt sokhraneniya, strategii renovatsii: sb. tezisov Vserossiiskoi nauchnoi konferentsii, posvyashchonnoi 175-letiyu Russkogo geograficheskogo obshchestva i 90-letiyu KhantyMansiiskogo avtonomnogo okruga [Industrial heritage of Russia: interdisciplinary research, conservation experience, renovation strategies: Abstracts of the All-Russian Scientific Conference dedicated to the 175th anniversary of the Russian Geographical Society and the 90th anniversary of the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug]. Khanty-Mansiysk, 2020. 203 p.

5. Lebedeva I. P. Yaponiya: promyshlennost’ i predprinimatel’stvo (vtoraya polovina XX – nachalo XXI v.) [Japan: Industry and Entrepreneurship (second half of the 20th – early 21st centuries)]. Moscow, Vostochnaya literature Publ., 2007. 223 p.

6. Litvinenko T. V. [The experience of organizing domestic tourism in Japan and the possibility of its use in Russia]. In: Tretyakova T. N., ed. Sovremennye problemy nauki turindustrii: nauch.-prakt. yezhegodnaya prepodavatelskaya konferentsiya [Modern problems of the science of the tourism industry: scientific and practical annual teaching conference]. Chelyabinsk, 2015, pp. 20–26.

7. Lomakina N. V. [The mineral resource sector of Northeast Asia. Resources and prospects]. In: Rossiya i ATR [Russia and Asia-Pacific], 2004, no. 4, pp. 125–137.

8. Sanzheev E. D., Osodoev P. V. [Features of integration processes in the sphere of tourism in the regions of the Great Tea Road]. In: Moskovskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal [Moscow Economic Journal], 2020, no. 9, pp. 435–449. DOI: 10.24411/2413-046x-2020-10636

9. Sankova A. S. [Industrial heritage: towards the development of a classification]. In: Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo instituta kultury [Bulletin of the St. Petersburg State Institute of Culture], 2022, no. 3, pp. 97–101.

10. Byambajav D., Litvinenko T. V., Oishi Y., Shiotani M., Takakura H. [Transformation of a mining enterprise and its impact on the surrounding area (on the example of the city of Kaimashi): Japanese experience and lessons for Russia. In: Streletsky V. N., ed. Staroosvoennye raiony: genezis, istoricheskie sudby, sovremennye trendy razvitiya: mat-ly XXXV ezhegodnoi sessii ekonomiko-geograficheskoi sektsii Mezhdunarodnoi akademii regionalnogo razvitiya i sotrudnichestva [Old-developed areas: genesis, historical destinies, modern development trends: materials of the 35th annual session of the economic and geographical section of the International Academy of Regional Development and Cooperation]. Tver, 2019, pp. 280–290.

11. Jelen J. Mining Heritage and Mining Tourism. In: Czech Journal of Tourism, 2018, no. 7 (1), pp. 93–105. DOI: 10.1515/cjot-2018-0005

12. Jun Ui, ed. Industrial Pollution in Japan. Tokyo, United Nations University Press, 1992. 198 p.

13. Limpitlaw D., Briel A. Post-mining land use opportunities in developing countries. In: Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 2014, no. 114 , pp. 899–903.

14. Litvinenko T. V. Socioecological consequences of the transformation of natural resource utilization in Russia’s Eastern part in the Post-Soviet period. In: Regional Research of Russia, 2012, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 273–284.