Agricultural primitivization as a factor and consequence of economic development of the Smolensk region

Aim. To evaluate the current state of agricultural primitivization and search for ways of possible agricultural development in the Smolensk region in the face of complex processes in the economy of Russia and the subject of the Federation.

Methodology. The analysis of factors of primitivization formation in agriculture of the Smolensk region is carried out. To understand the current processes, it was necessary to introduce and delimit the concept of «primitivization of agriculture» by territory, to identify clear features that are characteristic of the Smolensk region. The role of the region in the country’s economy and the possibilities of its studying were analyzed based on the available scientific sources. Dynamic trends were calculated, which made it possible to compare the region with the surrounding territories and draw conclusions about the ongoing processes. The study used the method of comparative analysis and typology, comparative historical method, factor analysis.

Results. Based on the study, the agricultural primitivization influence on the development of the Smolensk region economy is shown, at the same time the role of the primitivization of the industry in connection with the depopulation and the depressive development of the territory is revealed. It is shown that primitivization is determined both by the conditions of the existing natural resource potential and by the influence of the institutional factor that determines the conditions for supporting the industry and the possible use of investments. A few ways of possible development of the territory are suggested relying on the innovative approaches.

Research implications. The article summarizes new material and introduces into the scientific circulation the concept of “primitivization of agriculture”, as well as proposes the approaches to change the trajectory of the development of the agricultural industry in the conditions of a depressive economy and a deteriorating social situation in the region. The main provisions proposed in the article can be used to improve the economic policy of the governing bodies of the Smolensk region. 

1. Gvozdetsky N. A., Zvorykin K. V., eds. Agroprirodnoye i selskokhozyaystvennoye rayonirovaniye Nechernozemnoy zony yevropeyskoy chasti RSFSR [Agro-natural and agricultural zoning of the Non-Chernozem zone of the European part of the RSFSR]. Moscow, Izd-vo MGU Publ., 1987. 270 p.

2. Alekseev A. I., Safronov S. G. [Private farms in the regions of Russia in the late XX – early XXI centuries]. In: Regionalnyye issledovaniya [Regional studies], 2017, no. 4 (58), pp. 24–35.

3. Antipova E. A. [Population dynamics of the inter-capital location of the Belarusian-Russian border region in the XXI century]. In: Katrovsky A. P., Shuvalov V. E., Agirrechu A. A., eds. [Socio-economic geography: history, theory, methods, practice 2021]. Smolensk, Izd-vo Smolenskogo gosudarstvennogo un-ta Publ., 2021, pp. 222–229.

4. Artobolevsky S. S., Borodina T. L., Volkova I. N., Glezer O. B., Khantashkeeva T. V., Chasovsky V. I. [Russian-Belarusian border cooperation (results of expeditionary research in the Smolensk and Mogilev regions)]. In: Pskovskiy regionologicheskiy zhurnal [Pskov regional journal], 2006, no. 2, pp. 152–163.

5. Semenov (Tyan-Shansky) V. P., Dovnar-Zapolsky I. V., Shendrik D. Z., et al. Verkhneye Podneprovye i Belorussiya. Polnoye geograficheskoye opisaniye nashego Otechestva [Upper Dnieper and Belarus. Full geographical description of our Fatherland]. Minsk, BelEn Publ., 2006. 456 p.

6. Danshin A. I. [Path dependence effect in agriculture of depressive territories]. In: Geograficheskaya sreda i zhivyye sistemy [Geographical environment and living systems], 2020, no. 2, pp. 100–112. DOI: 10.18384/2712-7621-2020-2-100-112

7. Danshin A. I. [Agriculture of the Smolensk region in the internuclear space of the Minsk and Moscow agglomerations]. In: Agirrechu A. A., Katrovsky A. P., Shuvalov V. E., eds. Sotsialnoekonomicheskaya geografiya: istoriya, teoriya, metody, praktika 2021 [Socio-economic geography: history, theory, methods, practice 2021]. Smolensk, Izd-vo Smolenskogo gosudarstvennogo un-ta Publ., 2021, pp. 251–258.

8. Danshin A. I., Aksenova E. A. [Transformation of farming systems in Russian regions as a process of adaptation of agricultural specialization to new conditions of rural development]. In: Geografiya v shkole [Geography at school], 2019, no. 8, pp. 3–10.

9. Kalinin A. M., Samokhvalov V. A. [Effectiveness of financial support to agriculture: general assessment and inter-budgeta effect]. In: Problemy prognozirovaniya [Forecasting Problems], 2020, no. 5, pp. 142–152.

10. Morachevskaya K. A., Lyzhina E. A. [Institutional gradients in the Russian-Belarusian border area (on the example of the conditions for the development of the agro-industrial complex)]. In: Fedorova G. M., Zhindareva L. A., et al. Baltiyskiy region – region sotrudnichestva – 2019: mat-ly III mezhd. nauchno-prakt. konf. [The Baltic region – a region of cooperation – 2019: materials of the 3d int. scientific and practical. conf.]. Kaliningrad, Balt. fed. un-t im. I. Kant Publ., 2020, pp. 190–201.

11. Ridevsky G. V., Shadrakov A. V., Katrovsky A. P., Kovalev Yu. P. [Russian-Belarusian border area: potential, challenges of the time and development trends]. In: Katrovsky A. P., ed. Rossiysko-belorusskoye prigranichye: problemy i perspektivy razvitiya: sb. mat-ov mezhdun. nauch. konf. [Russian-Belarusian border area: problems and development prospects: sat. mat-s intern. scientific conf.]. Smolensk, Universum Publ., 2016, pp. 9–20.

12. Katrovsky A. P., Yaskova T. I., ed. Rossiysko-belorusskoye prigranich’ye: vyzovy mezhstolichnogo polozheniya [Russian-Belarusian border area: challenges of the inter-capital situation]. Smolensk, Izd-vo Smolenskogo gosudarstvennogo un-ta Publ., 2022. 312 p.

13. Katrovsky A. P., Yaskova T. I., eds. «Effekt kolei»: traditsionnoye i innovatsionnoye v razvitii Smolenskoy oblasti [«Effect of track»: traditional and innovative in the development of the Smolensk region]. Smolensk, Izd-vo Smolenskogo gosudarstvennogo un-ta Publ., 2021. 172 p.

14. Yaskova T. I. [Byside region of metropolitan as a recipient of the crisis phenomena: view of problem in the light of geographical theory]. In: Regionalnyye issledovaniya [Regional studies], 2010, no. 1 (27), pp. 29–38.

15. Reimund D. A., Martin J. R., Moore C. V. Structural change in agriculture: the experience for broilers, fed cattle, and processing vegetable. Washington, 1981. 73 p.